Top Stories

People Share The Best Answers To The 'What Is Your Biggest Weakness?' Interview Question

People Share The Best Answers To The 'What Is Your Biggest Weakness?' Interview Question

You know it's coming.

[rebelmouse-image 18356687 is_animated_gif= dam=1 expand=1]

Literally, it's the most uncomfortable question of the entire job interview process, which is really something, because asking millennials "Where do you see yourself in five years?" is like asking a starving person "Where's your lunch?" Somehow, this question surpasses it. "What is your biggest weakness?"

Well, PlatypusFez wanted to be armed with a better answer before they got trapped:

When an employer asks 'What is your biggest weakness', what are some good responses?

Read and learn.

Honesty Is The Best Policy

[rebelmouse-image 18346089 is_animated_gif= dam=1 expand=1]

"What is your biggest strength?"

I can make decisions quickly in high-pressure situations.

"What is your biggest weakness?"

I make awful decisions.

Roundabout

[rebelmouse-image 18356688 is_animated_gif= dam=1 expand=1]

Interviewer: Where do you see yourself in 5 years?

Me: I'd say my biggest weakness is listening.

Ball's In Your Court

[rebelmouse-image 18356689 is_animated_gif= dam=1 expand=1]

"I tend to react violently to bad news."

"Um..."

"So, am I hired or not?"

Do You Struggle With This, Too?

[rebelmouse-image 18356690 is_animated_gif= dam=1 expand=1]

I recently went with "I sometimes take on too much work myself rather than delegating to other people". I then follow it up with how I've worked on it and had to get a lot better at it in my last job.

Other Weaknesses

[rebelmouse-image 18356691 is_animated_gif= dam=1 expand=1]

At my last job when I was asked this I said "I can't fold a fitted bed sheet."

Everyone kind of tittered and I said "It's true, every week I pull that sheet out of the dryer and think, "this is the week" and then I fail. But I keep trying every week".

I got the job.

And yes, I've watched videos, I've had people show me in person-I still can't get it right.

It Isn't So Hard

[rebelmouse-image 18356692 is_animated_gif= dam=1 expand=1]

My wife always says 'parallel parking'.

Don't Set Us Up To Fail

[rebelmouse-image 18348908 is_animated_gif= dam=1 expand=1]

My stock answer to this has always been :-

"I can get bored easy and become unmotivated unless I'm fairly busy."

It's never let me down yet, although I'm more the interviewer than the interviewee these days and would never ask this question in an interview.

TBH now I'm thinking about it, if they ask you this then your interviewer is probably not very good.

Extreme

[rebelmouse-image 18356693 is_animated_gif= dam=1 expand=1]

I once said:

"Look, I know I'm meant to take a positive and spin it as a negative, but I feel that's dishonest. So my weakness is that I don't like playing mindgames with my interviewer."

Yeah don't do that. The feedback I got was that I'm extremely arrogant, and I didn't get the job.

SAT Words

[rebelmouse-image 18356694 is_animated_gif= dam=1 expand=1]

It can be anything, as long as it's realistic and as long as you follow up with ways you've worked on fixing it or improving. For example, I always say that I have a hard time with time management and prioritizing different tasks, but then I follow up immediately with how I've worked on ranking different projects based on certain criteria (deadline, expected time to finish, etc.) and sorting them that way. Compartmentalizing and sh*t. Compartmentalizing is a great word. Throw that in there.

Heyyy Wait A Sec

[rebelmouse-image 18356695 is_animated_gif= dam=1 expand=1]

"I lie to avoid hurting people's feelings."

Then you compliment the interviewer's shirt.

No Patience

[rebelmouse-image 18356696 is_animated_gif= dam=1 expand=1]

"I have absolutely no patience for office politics, conspiracies, bullying, micro management, or corporate cheerleading. I want to work somewhere friendly and open and fair, where I can treat colleagues as equals and be pretty much left to do my job - in return, I can do it extremely well." Said this at the interview for my current job, been here a year and a half and everything is good. I've worked some places where everyone was horrible to each other, and it just isn't worth the cost to your soul.

Obligatory

[rebelmouse-image 18356697 is_animated_gif= dam=1 expand=1]

Pick anything relatively innocuous (stay away from "motherf-cker looks at me wrong, I waste 'em") but still plausible. Any normal, reasonable human character flaw. "I can be impatient with people who don't grasp or follow things as quickly as I do." "I overanalyze tasks before I begin them, which leads me to procrastinate actually starting the work." "I do a lot of processing and reflecting internally before I speak, which can lead people to believe I'm not contributing to a conversation."

Then - this is the key - tack on a piece about how you've learned to manage or compensate for it. "I usually remind myself that I was new at a task once myself, and what may seem second nature to me is less apparent to others. In fact, I take note of the questions the other person asks and develop an FAQ or teaching tool." "I've found it helps if I pick a basic first step and get started, and create deadlines down the line for making major decisions about the task. This helps me keep some flexibility while still making progress." "I usually make a point of saying 'these are just my preliminary thoughts, but...' and then sharing a little bit about my reaction."

The purpose of this question isn't to force you to convey the impression that you're flawless. No one is. It's to check and see if you're self-aware about what your limitations are and to see whether you're actively trying to improve.

(Source: Am HR.)

Not Subtle

[rebelmouse-image 18356698 is_animated_gif= dam=1 expand=1]

"Those eyes"

leans in for kiss

Super Effective

[rebelmouse-image 18356699 is_animated_gif= dam=1 expand=1]

"I'm weak against grass-types"

Once Again, The Honesty

[rebelmouse-image 18356700 is_animated_gif= dam=1 expand=1]

"My biggest weakness is that sometimes in interviews, I have absolutely no idea how to answer some of the questions"

I always get the job

Call Center

[rebelmouse-image 18356701 is_animated_gif= dam=1 expand=1]

As someone who interviewed literally 10's of thousands of people over the years for entry level jobs with a required set of questions (that included this weakness one), this answer would be enough for me to hire the person (provided everything else was at least okay).

To me, it shows that they understand that interviews are more about getting to know the person and that shows a certain level of intelligence. With that knowledge I can reasonably say that I could teach them the basics of any job I'd need them to do. And who knows, they might have a good time with a humorous attitude.

I'm wondering how well it would go for a job in a more professional setting. I figure just fine, but I could see situations where it wouldn't be as funny.

Showcase It

[rebelmouse-image 18356702 is_animated_gif= dam=1 expand=1]

Pull a card out of your pocket that has "I over prepare" written on it.

Unexpected

[rebelmouse-image 18356704 is_animated_gif= dam=1 expand=1]

"I'm lazy. Which means I will find the quickest and best solution to complete a task so I don't have to do it twice."

This person actually got hired.

Twinning...With Myself.

[rebelmouse-image 18356705 is_animated_gif= dam=1 expand=1]

I got this question right after "What is your greatest strength?". My greatest strength is my tenacity. When faced with a problem, I'm going to solve it, no matter how long it takes. My biggest weakness? My tenacity. Sometimes I forget/ refuse to ask for/ realize I need help. They offered me the job three hours later.

Meatbags

[rebelmouse-image 18356706 is_animated_gif= dam=1 expand=1]

My entire underbelly is exposed to predators. I have a poor diet and no combat training. You could easily hit my viral organs and I'd perish immediately.

Clever Dog Tricks McDonald's Customers Into Feeding Her By Pretending To Be A Stray 😂
Facebook Betsy Reyes

It's a dog eat dog world out there and sometimes a girl has to do what a girl has to do. At least that's what one dog owner realized when she caught her pooch trolling the streets looking for an easy meal.

Keep reading... Show less
Scotland Tackles Transphobia and Homophobia In Brilliant New Billboard Ads ❤️
(OneScotland)

The Scottish government has had enough of hate crimes and is moving forward with a gutsy campaign.

According to Pink News, Scotland is launching a new initiative to combat intolerance with messages respectively addressing "bigots," "disablists," "homophobes," "racists," and "transphobes" in a series of ads circulating across the country.

Each message is signed on behalf of Scotland.

Keep reading... Show less
Katy Perry, P!nk, Paul McCartney And More Sign Letter Threatening To Boycott SiriusXM Radio
Photos by John Shearer-Direct Management-Christopher Polk-Gary Gershoff-WireImage

Hundreds of artists have signed a letter threatening a boycott if SiriusXM's parent company, Liberty Media, doesn't back down from opposing the Music Modernization Act.

The act, which was expected to pass through Congress, streamlines royalty payments in the new age of digital technology, but it seems SiriusXM is objecting to a small section that would have the satellite radio company paying royalties on recordings dating before 1972.

That's a whole lot of songs and a whole lot of money the company is hoping to skip out on paying, but not if stars like Paul McCartney, P!nk, Stevie Nicks, Sia, Carly Simon, Gloria Estefan, Mick Fleetwood, Don Henley, Max Martin, and Katy Perry can help it.

The letter read, in part:

I'm writing you with grave concern about SiriusXM's opposition to the Music Modernization Act (Classics Act included).

We are all aware of your company's objections and trepidation but let me say that this is an opportunity for SiriusXM to take a leadership position. As you are aware, 415 Representatives and 76 Senators have already cosponsored the MMA along with industry consensus. It's SiriusXM vs all of us. We can either fight to the bitter end or celebrate this victory together. Rather than watch bad press and ill will pile up against SiriusXM, why not come out supporting the most consequential music legislation in 109 years? We do not want to fight and boycott your company but we will as we have other opponents. Stand with us! Be brave and take credit for being the heroes who helped the MMA become historic law! Momentum is building against SiriusXM and you still have an opportunity to come out on the right side of history. We look forward to your endorsement but the fire is burning and only you can put this out.

SiriusXM resoponded with a letter of their own:

Over the past several weeks, we have been the subject of some stinging attacks from the music community and artists regarding our views on the Music Modernization Act. Contrary to new reports and letters, this is really not about a SiriusXM victory, but implementing some simple, reasonable and straightforward amendments to MMA. There is nothing in our "asks" that gut the MMA or kills the Act. So let's talk about the substance of the amendments we propose, because we truly do not understand the objections or why these concepts have incited such a holy war.ontrary to the accusations, SiriusXM has proposed three simple amendments to the MMA.

First, SiriusXM has asked that the CLASSICS Act recognize that it has already licensed all of the pre-1972 works it uses. This amendment would ensure that artists – the people who are supposed to be at the heart of the MMA – receive 50% of the monies under those existing licenses. Is that unfair? Just today, Neil Diamond wrote in the LA Times that: "I receive a small amount of songwriting royalties, but no royalties as the recording artist." How can that happen? To date, SiriusXM has paid nearly $250 million dollars in pre-'72 royalties to the record labels. We want to make sure that a fair share of the monies we have paid, and will pay, under these licenses gets to performers. Without this provision, artists may never see any of the money SiriusXM paid, and will pay, for the use of pre-1972 works. Artists not getting paid hurts our business!

Second, Sirius XM thinks that the fair standard to use in rate setting proceedings is the standard that Congress chose in 1995 and confirmed again in 1998 – which is called the 801(b) standard. However, we are willing to move the "willing buyer/willing seller" standard contained in the MMA. In exchange, we have asked for the same concession that the MMA grants to other digital music services, but we were left out of — simply that the rates that were set last year for five years now apply for ten years. We thought this was a fair compromise when we read the "new" MMA that was released this weekend by the Senate, and are willing to live by that compromise.

Third, SiriusXM is asking the simple question: "Why are we changing the rate court evidence standard for musical compositions in this legislation so that it gives another advantage to broadcasters over satellite radio and streaming services?" There is no policy rationale for this change to tilt the playing field further in their favor, and frankly no one has been able to explain it to us. It is only fair that we debate why the change to Section 114(i) is in the MMA.

Did you all catch that? It sounds like lawyer speak for "we don't really want to say where we stand."

media.giphy.com

It seems all the letters were for naught. The Music Modernization Act passed in the U.S. Senate.




It was time to celebrate and dance in the streets.









As the saying goes, honest pay for honest work.

media.giphy.com


H/T: Variety, Spin

Some Residents Of Uranus, Missouri Are Not Happy About The Name Of Their New Local Newspaper 😆
CBS Philly/YouTube, @ShirtlessKirk/Twitter

There's nothing like a good pun about human anatomy. Really gets the juices flowing!


Owners of the new Uranus Examiner must have been snickering as they announced the paper's name. Apparently, it's caused quite the controversy in the small town of Uranus, Missouri, over the last few days.

Residents are divided over whether the pun is an embarrassment or perfectly snarky:


Folks on the internet responded with maturity and composure after learning about the Uranus Examiner.

Oh, wait. No they didn't.





If you think about it... there might actually be a method to the madness here. The brand new paper's name has received widespread media coverage over this past week. Simply put... everyone's talking about Uranus.

In terms of publicizing their new venture, the owners of the Uranus Examiner have actually done a pretty sweet job!


In the video above, a woman suggests the paper should have been called "The Pulaski County Examiner."

If you ask me, that's TOTALLY BORING, and wouldn't have generated as much interest and publicity for the paper. So while the name might be cringeworthy to some, you can bet Uranus that it'll stick around. Who knows, Uranus might even grow as a result!

H/T: Indy100, The Kansas City Star